MXMMM/Our standards

Clear terms.
Evidence you can inspect.

A recommendation should explain the fit. A proposal should explain the work. A report should show what was actually checked.

Relevant evidence, with its limits made clear.

01 / Publisher selection

What we review in a publisher

Subject and audience relevance

We examine the publication’s actual topics, recent content, and available audience evidence. Estimated traffic or geography is identified by source and date, not presented as a measured fact without support.

Editorial practice

We review article quality, authorship information, commercial disclosure, and the fit between your subject and the publication. A high third-party metric alone is not a sufficient reason to recommend a site.

Authority to arrange publication

We establish whether the contact operates the publication or represents it with authorization, and confirm the practical cooperation terms before offering the placement.

Deliverable conditions

We confirm the content format, approval rights, link attributes, expected timing, retention, and issue-handling process. Verification scope and unresolved details are stated in the proposal.

02 / Commercial transparency

Paid content stays identifiable

Commercial publication is not presented as earned press, independent product testing, or an unsolicited expert recommendation. Disclosure and link treatment are confirmed before publication.

We do not promise a particular review score, hide a sponsorship label, invent test results, or describe a paid article as an independent endorsement. Supplied claims and assets require supporting evidence and appropriate rights.

03 / Evidence

Delivery evidence and AI evidence are different

RecordWhat it establishes
Publication recordThe agreed article was published at the recorded URL and date.
Accessibility checkThe page could be accessed at the recorded time. This does not prove indexing.
Search observationA specific search result or authorized inspection was observed. Unknown status remains unknown.
AI brand mentionThe brand appeared in a recorded answer. This does not establish a citation to the purchased article.
AI page citationA recorded answer cited the specific URL under the documented conditions. It does not establish that publication caused the citation.
04 / Honest reporting

No manufactured proof

No invented client logos, testimonials, publisher counts, qualifications, audience statistics, or AI citation screenshots. Examples are labeled as examples. Claims of an existing relationship require confirmation.

The website presents service information in readable text. Search and AI inclusion remain decisions of the relevant products; accessibility and structured information are not promises of citation.

Platform reference

Google explains that meeting its requirements does not guarantee indexing or serving, and recommends qualifying paid links. These references apply to Google; they are not universal AI-platform rules.

Google AI features guidance ↗Google paid-link guidance ↗Relevant guidance checked October 16, 2026.
A conversation comes first

Find the right fit
for your next story.

Share a short introduction.
We’ll clarify the publishing options by email.

Discuss your project Budget is optional. No commitment to start.